|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Search
Recent Articles
Recent Comments
Month Archive
This Month
Blogging Sites/Resources
|
Sunday, July 30
by
Richard A D Jones
on July 30, 2006 02:32PM (BST)
I get to work with a lot of new companies and corporate ventures and, you know what, they frequently have no clue about what a real customer wants. Cambridge (the UK one) is a great place for technology innovation but even the smartest people don't always understand about having a real market. They have the “Field of Dreams” view about customers - 'if I build it, they will come." However, this mistake isn't limited to startups - I worked with a European electronics multinational and I couldn’t believe their approach to innovation.
The division I worked with produced equipment for automating factories - essentially like computers with input and output connections to make machines work. Here were two classic conversations with them. "Good news Richard - we have done a deal with M****** (identity masked to protect the innocent) and will be distributing their single board computer series. Our arrangement means we will have the same market price as them." "Okay. What do you mean by market price?" "Our list price is identical to their’s." "Hang on," say I, "our normal customer gets a discount of 10% whereas M****** give a discount of 30% as standard. Our real market price to users or distributors is going to be significantly higher than their’s. In what way do you think that is market pricing?" ....silence.... more » Monday, November 28
by
Richard A D Jones
on November 28, 2005 06:46PM (GMT)
In another post, I put up the graphic above as an approach to assessing different projects within a porfolio and understanding the overall ‘balance’. The projects here represent a company that is sticking pretty close to home in terms of what it does but is expending significant money in trying to develop technology led approaches to their market (the diameter of the circle represents the money committed to the project). more »Sunday, November 27
by
Richard A D Jones
on November 27, 2005 05:10PM (GMT)
![]() This is start of a ‘back of an envelope’ guide to portfolio management.
Portfolio management is the set of activities that seek to find and maintain the optimum current and future balance of R&D projects to support the busines strategy.*
I wrote this almost 10 years ago but exactly the same problems face companies today.
There are many approaches to selecting individual projects such as simple project attractiveness ratings, however selecting a set of projects (or portfolio) requires you to:
more »
Saturday, November 26
by
Richard A D Jones
on November 26, 2005 03:12PM (GMT)
People often forget that the reason you try to understand what you are currently doing in R&D is so you can make better decisions in future. Representing projects graphically allows you to understand the portfolio at a higher level and is ideal for the senior management team when they are contemplating where they are compared to where they are trying to get to.
There are a couple of other blogs about this but I was too tired to put in these final diagrams. Again, there’s no right or wrong – just different ways of viewing what you have. I think they’re pretty self-explanatory. I’d write more but there’s a guy playing his i-Pod so loud I could sing along and I’m just off to garrott him with his own headphone cable. If there are no more posts – please come visit me in prison.
more »
Thursday, November 17
by
Richard A D Jones
on November 17, 2005 11:39PM (GMT)
Something is a specialist skill that only a few people can do and gradually it becomes more widely available, cheaper and easier to use (no punchcards in computers now - only blue screens of death and sanctimonious Mac users to deal with).
This article talks about the inexorable march of technologies and produsts from high cost, scarcities to being cheap and on your desktop etc.
![]() more »
Keywords:
ventures,
strategy,
startups,
startup,
product,
pricing,
portfolio,
management,
innovation
Tuesday, October 11
by
Richard A D Jones
on October 11, 2005 06:36PM (BST)
This is really simple but works. Think about the processes involved in going from innovation to product/feature delivery. If they are supposed to work closely together then put them close together. Is that it? Okay not quite. To maximise the interactions between different groups, try to increase the size of the physical interface between them. I'd say that in English if I could. Maybe an example will help - doubt it but worth a try. If you have a development team and an industrialisation team say - then don't design the office so they are separated. See if you can set it up so that as many people as possible are next to someone from the other department. I don't mean mixing them up completely as you want each group to still function well on their own. I just mean think about how you can create long borders between groups where colleagues from the different groups can talk. © Copyright Richard A D Jones 2005 Friday, October 7
by
Richard A D Jones
on October 7, 2005 02:25PM (BST)
When your project has reached a decision point, do you really want to wait until the management team can assemble? Are you sure they will have time to get to your part of the agenda? You've probably been in a project that gets bounced from at least one meeting and has to wait.
The key here is to remove senior management physically from the decision making process. more »
Tuesday, September 27
by
Richard A D Jones
on September 27, 2005 09:09PM (BST)
This approach provides a simple way to compare the 'attractiveness' of different candidate projects.
more »
Wednesday, September 21
by
Richard A D Jones
on September 21, 2005 07:07PM (BST)
You can't create a change in behaviours by changing a job title (sadly - it would be much easier if you could). The person will return to work on Monday morning, sit down and start doing the same things they were doing before you changed their title. more »
Sunday, September 11
by
Richard A D Jones
on September 11, 2005 06:18PM (BST)
Innovation is like a sales funnel, you get prospects in one end and hopefully ‘sales’ out of the other end. The costs associated with generating concepts, clustering, evaluating etc. can be very significant and the business should really understand how these costs are spent throughout the process. more »
|
Welcome to this blog about innovation, managing product development and creating successful corporate ventures and startups. Enjoy your stay!
Richard A D Jones. About me
My life is developing innovative ideas through to successful corporate or standalone ventures (including taking one to Nasdaq (post-acquisition).
I have helped create products in telecoms, healthcare, computing, electronics as well as software and in use with companies such as Universal Studios, BT and the BBC... more Links
Login
Copyright 2005 by Richard A D Jones
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




This approach provides a simple way to compare the 'attractiveness' of different candidate projects.